Notes.
L. 1. (Start of stk.) The record may have opened with an obeisance to Viшнu.
L. 2. (For vyadadhada) The correct grammatical form would be vyadadhаd=. (For hatаmаyurapyуrjji[tеpan]) The context requires a reading like apy=уrjjitaм vaх. (After [tpala*]) Restore щyаmalаm. SR has щrиyyaх
L. 3. SR has [щaщatsu]svаyаstu-vaх, from notes - according to correction slip for kakшayа read kаntayаkаsauyа.
L. 4. SR has from notes - according to correction slip for hi(tе ?) vаgbhirnna - kiмvаgbhirnnu-; -ambhadhivиci-
L. 5. (End of verse 6)SR- Some four akшaras like dbhavо vaмщaх are lost here. It is curious to note that the name Щrи-Pуrннаditya in characters of the 8th century A. D. occure on two pillars of this temple at Rаjim, A.S.I.R., Vol. XVII, Plate X. [The visarga-sandhi in the preceding word - pratаpо does not justify the proposed reading Pуraннаditya in the present insctance.—B.C.C.]. SR has ghаram; harivvaх; -pratаpо(paх) - in notes - according to the correction slip read - -pratаpи;
L. 6. SR has аsid-; -pаdapadamaх
L. 8. VM, SR suggest (For [tр] Я Я я maх) The last seven akшaras of this verse were probably Mаndhаtр-rаj-оpamaх.
L. 9. VM, SR suggest (For [щru]tеna ca pам) The context requires a reading like щrutеna vimalaх. (After -tastyа) Restore s=tyаginам.
L. 10. SR: suggest in notes - instead [rvvu(rbbu)]dhaх read -rgguнaiх.
L. 11. SR: has gamоnurаgаdharaх instead gamаnurаgadharaх; according correction slip after vilаsatuкgaх read -prathita.
L. 12. SR: according correction slip for vijayаdhи[щaм ?] read vijayи dhиraх
L. 14. SR read yaщо instead yaщам
L. 15 VM, SR (End of stk.) The akшaras lost here and at the beginning of the next line may have been su-viщa. SR: according correction slip for [ni]tyana[vyе ?] read janmanede-;SR: instead prаtarvvа[rvvа]lаrkkarоcir- read prаtarbаlаrkkarоcir-
L. 16. SR read mahad-dушaнaм instead mahad-bhушaнaм; instead dрштirasyаm read dрштirasyam
L. 18. VM, SR (After vici[traм]) Restore jagat. VM (For puruшенa) These akшaras are almost clear in the estampage.
L. 19. VM, SR (Verse. 26) This and the next pаda must have begun with yаvat. (For bhаsanti) VM, SR This is incorrect for bhаsante. SR read lоlаlоka instead lеlаlоka;
L. 20. SR: according correction slip for si[ktha ?] read sindhu; VM, SR (After dhavalа) Some word like nidrаti is expected here, but the first akшara appears like ha. VM, SR (End of stk.) Restore prаjгах; SR read vakшa[sthalе], va Я nti;
L. 21. VM (After praщasti) Restore r=еша. SR read prаviracitа;