Notes

L. 1. LP read: ом svasti [|*], ом expressed by a symbol. (LP); AMS (in notes) Siddham expressed by a symbol. (For vikkramо) one part of the medial o is attached to the top of m and the other part is formed by the elongation to the right of the horizontal line of m.
L. 3. (For paramabhаgavatо) The engraver had begun to incise ma after pa, but later on corrected it into ra. (LP)
L. 4. (For щщrи) The subscript r appears like the sign of medial р. (LP), LP read tоsaddu(дu)bhuktиya-
L. 5. This (|) mark of punctuation is shown by two dots. (LP) Pandeya transcribes this mark of punctuation, which consists of a couple of strokes, by a single daндa. (AMS)
L. 7. LP read -аndhakа[raм], in notes: The letter ra which was first omitted is written below ja of jagad with a kаkapada sign and the anusvаra meant for ra is placed on kа. The cross on ja shows that a syllable was omitted.; (AMS in notes) Ra, which was at first omitted by oversight, is written below ja with a kаkapada mark (+) and the anusvаra, which should have been placed over ra, is placed over kа. (For jagad-) There is a kаkapada over ja indicating that something has to be inserted here. Actually its proper place was over kа.
L. 8. тa in bhaтa is written below the line. The visarga (in visarjjitaх) is superfluous.
L. 10. LP read: adhyarddhакщana (in notes: read adhyarddhамщеna); kumаravatsaа(vatsа)nnе-.
L. 11. LP read yajгasvаmina(nau), in notes: read pratyaмщеna. Kha, which is faint in the facsimile accompanying Pandeya's article, is quite clear in the facsimile given by B.C. Jain.
L. 12. Pandeya reads -madhyandina-. But the medial а is clearly indicated by the downward elongation of the right vertical of m, AMS reads -gоlasvаmi(mи),
(for еvaм): This word is unnecessary.(AMS). LP reads dаmasvаmi.
L. 13. in notes name read: pratyardhамщеna.
L. 14. (For anumоditaх) The medial i sign which was first engraved above taх by mistake has been cancelled. Lp. read tе yуyam=.
L. 16. (After viщiштa) There are two small horizontal strokes here (LP), There is full mark of punctuation here which is unnecessary. (AMS)
L. 18. Metre: Vasantatilakа. LP read gоpta[m].
L. 20. The sign of punctuation (||) here is superfluous.
L. 21. Metre: Indravajrа.
L. 23. LP read: datа(ttа).
L. 24. Metre: Anuштubh.
L. 25. The syllables dаnа which were omitted here have been incised below the line with a kаkapada sign. Read --mahimatаг-, pаlanam || iti. Metre: Anuштubh. (LP). The letters dаnа, which were omitted here, have been engraved below the line with a kаkapada mark. There is a kаkapada sign before штha also. Its proper place was after штha. (AMS)
L. 26. [I am inclined to read this symbol 8 as 7.-Ed. in EI] LP read 8 instead 7 and Drонa[siмghе]na. AMS about date: Pandeya reads the figure as 8, but we feel inclined to agree with N.P. Chakravarti in taking it as 7. See El, xxiii, 22, fn. 4.